6 Comments
Jan 21Liked by Nancy Friedman

Just a note- aid and abet are two different things- aid means assist, abet means encourage.

Expand full comment
author

Isn't encouragement a kind of assistance, though? Close enough to be classified (by people smarter than I) as a legal doublet.

Expand full comment
Jan 21Liked by Nancy Friedman

They are both modes of criminal liability, but if I hand you the weapon to hit someone with, or, once you are hitting them, I say 'hit them some more', those are very different WAYS of assisting, the latter really stretching the meaning of assist...Also, it is usually 'aid OR abet', minimizing its doublet: here is an extract from the Canadian Criminal Code using 'or':

21 (1) Every one is a party to an offence who

(a) actually commits it;

(b) does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or

(c) abets any person in committing it.

Expand full comment
author

This may be a US/Canada distinction. As far as I can tell, it's always "aid AND abet" in the US. Definitely in California, where I live. https://www.lacriminaldefenseattorney.com/legal-dictionary/a/aiding-and-abetting/

Expand full comment
Jan 21Liked by Nancy Friedman

I've always thought it was strange that sports commentators will refer to a team as a "franchise" — it seemed to be emphasizing the financial/business aspect in a way that I didn't think sports fans would prefer. It never occurred to me that that use might actually be older than the chain store/restaurant use!

Expand full comment
Jan 21Liked by Nancy Friedman

Haven’t heard it in that context...

Then there’s the word “disenfranchise,” which we hear more and more about these days.

Expand full comment